Resource Center
Research, guides, and real-world insights on online proctoring; helping your program deliver results that are fair, trustworthy, and defensible.
10M+
Assessments secured
Zero
Data breaches in 12+ years
98%
Client retention rate
120+
Resources published
Featured article
Trust by Evidence: A New Framework for Defensible AI Decisions
4
min read
Integrity Advocate has released a new whitepaper, Trust by Evidence, introducing a framework that connects AI due process, learner rights, and credential security into one model for defensible AI-assisted assessment. This post walks through what the framework covers, why AI adoption alone no longer settles the integrity question, and links to the full whitepaper download.
All resources
The Three Questions That Stayed With Us After D2L Fusion
July 20, 2026
|
5
min read
D2L Fusion 2026 reinforced a clear message for the future of education: innovation must be balanced with privacy, transparency, and human judgment. Inspired by three questions posed during the conference keynote, Integrity Advocate CEO Brandon Smith reflects on why responsible AI, Privacy by Design, and Verified by Human Review™ are essential to building trust and protecting assessment integrity in an AI-driven world.
What a 96% Midterm and a 48.6% Final Exam Reveal About Unproctored Assessments
July 14, 2026
|
7
min read
A welfare economics class at Brown University averaged 96% on a take-home midterm and 48.6% on an in-person final, a historic low for the course. Nineteen students failed. Twenty-two of the forty students who scored a perfect 100 on the midterm did not sit for the final at all. This post examines what the Brown case reveals about the two distinct failures that follow an unmonitored assessment, the upstream detection failure and the downstream adjudication failure, and why the fix is not more automation layered on top of automation but a human reviewer in the loop before a result is finalized.
Most Proctoring Tools React to Cheating. This Approach Prevents It.
July 9, 2026
|
2
min read
Most proctoring platforms are built to detect cheating after it happens. Integrity Advocate's security-based framework is designed to prevent it through deterrence, proportional response, and human-reviewed evidence, with Counter-AI as one component of a broader system built to adapt as threats evolve. This post introduces the framework and links to the full white paper.
AI-Only Proctoring Has a False Positive Problem. Here’s What That Costs Your Program.
June 24, 2026
|
5
min read
AI-only proctoring flags behavior. It doesn't evaluate it. When automated systems skip human review, wrongful invalidations follow, and programs are left with outcomes they can't defend.
Key Takeaways from eAA | What “The Trust Imperative” Actually Means for Assessment Right Now
June 19, 2026
|
3
min read
At the 2026 e-Assessment Association International Conference in London, the central theme was trust - specifically, how assessment programs can stay ahead of rapidly evolving AI-enabled cheating while preserving human oversight, candidate experience, and the credibility of every credential they issue.
Top No-Download, Browser-Based Proctoring Tools
June 16, 2026
|
7
min read
This blog post compares the leading no-download, browser-based proctoring platforms across key criteria - device compatibility, AI cheating detection, privacy design, and implementation friction - making the case that Integrity Advocate stands apart by including human review at every pricing tier as a standard feature, not an add-on.
The Hidden Liability in Every Online Safety Training Program
June 10, 2026
|
11
min read
Online safety training scaled compliance but it also created an accountability gap that most programs haven't closed. When an incident happens, a timestamp isn't enough; what protects your organization is a verified record proving the right person completed the training, with real engagement, that holds up under scrutiny.
Balancing Assessment Security and Privacy Within Modern Online EdD Programs
May 22, 2026
|
6
min read
Online EdD programs face a growing tension: assessments must be secure, but doctoral learners expect their privacy to be respected. In this guest post, Research.com's Stephanie Dion explores how institutions can move beyond surveillance-heavy models toward verification-based systems, risk-based authentication, and faculty preparedness that protect both academic integrity and learner trust.
Why Automated Identity Verification Isn’t Enough for High-Stakes Exams
May 18, 2026
|
10
min read
All proctoring vendors say they verify identity, but they don't all mean the same thing. Explore where automated-only ID checks fall short and what to ask when evaluating a platform.
